02030101 TMBA TMBA #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(3) > ul > li.toy_0 > a 02030101 TMBA TMBA #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box1 > ul > li:nth-child(1) > a 02030201 IMBA IMBA #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(3) > ul > li.toy_1 > a 02030201 IMBA IMBA #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box1 > ul > li:nth-child(2) > a 02030301 EMBA EMBA #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(3) > ul > li.toy_2 > a 02030301 EMBA EMBA #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box1 > ul > li:nth-child(4) > a 02030401 PMBA PMBA #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(3) > ul > li.last.toy_3 > a 02030401 PMBA PMBA #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box1 > ul > li:nth-child(3) > a 02040101 FMBA FMBA #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(4) > ul > li.toy_0 > a 02040101 FMBA FMBA #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box3 > ul > li:nth-child(1) > a 02040201 MFE MFE #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(4) > ul > li.toy_1 > a 02040201 MFE MFE #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box3 > ul > li:nth-child(3) > a 02040401 IMMBA IMMBA #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(4) > ul > li.toy_2 > a 02040401 IMMBA IMMBA #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box3 > ul > li:nth-child(2) > a 02040501 IMMS IMMS #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(4) > ul > li.toy_3 > a 02040501 IMMS IMMS #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box3 > ul > li:nth-child(4) > a 02040601 SEMBA SEMBA #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(4) > ul > li.toy_4 > a 02040601 SEMBA SEMBA #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box3 > ul > li:nth-child(6) > a 02040701 GP GP #tm_1th_2 > li:nth-child(4) > ul > li.last.toy_5 > a 02040701 GP GP #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box3 > ul > li:nth-child(7) > a 02040701 admission admission #txt > div.sub0303.mt_20 > div.btn_wrap > a 02040701 GP GP #mprovide > div > div > div.box.box3 > ul > li:nth-child(7) > a
본문 바로가기 사이트 메뉴 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Simple Mechanisms for Sequential Capacity Allocations

PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT2021-09

Kim, Bosung | Kim, Sang Won | Iravani, Seyed M. R. | Park, Kun Soo

We consider a sequential capacity allocation problem of a firm to its retail branches that sell the firm's product. The orders of the retail branches to the headquarters arrive sequentially, and each allocation decision has to be made before the next order arrives. The objective of the headquarters is to maximize the overall firm profit, that is, the total profit of all the retail branches. Each retail branch makes ordering decision independently by using private information about its local market condition in order to maximize its own profit. Hence, they may strategically inflate their order quantities in their favor, potentially hurting the firm profit. We first discuss the importance of capacity rationing in maximizing the firm's profit by finding the first-best allocation outcome, the optimal solution without information asymmetry. Based on this, we design mechanisms that effectively overcome the information asymmetry. First, we design a simple threshold-type mechanism where truthful reporting is optimal and capacity rationing is implemented by limiting allocation beyond a pre-specified threshold. We show this mechanism is optimal within the class of mechanisms that do not allow any side payments. We also design a mechanism with side payments that is optimal among all possible mechanisms. In particular, we show that this payment-based mechanism achieves the first-best allocation, fully overcoming information asymmetry. Although optimal, it may not be practical because of the complexity in the side payment menu, so we also propose a simple variant of it with only a few parameters. Our extensive numerical study shows that our simple threshold-type and payment-based mechanisms achieve near-optimal performance.

Publisher
WILEY
Issue Date
2021-09
Article Type
Article
Citation
PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, Vol.30, No.9, pp.2925 - 2943
ISSN
1059-1478
DOI
10.1111/poms.13411
만족도조사

이 페이지에서 제공하는 정보에 대하여 만족하십니까?

콘텐츠담당자 : 주선희 연락처 : 02-958-3602

교수 & 연구

관심자등록

KCB ISSUE